I
recently took part in an unofficial mini-reunion with some high school friends,
mostly people I’d known from my choir days, many of whom I hadn’t seen in quite
a few years. It was wonderful to reconnect with them again and learn about
their lives. And inevitably, as one would expect, our conversations would
meander through the common catch-up clichés: are you married, do you have kids,
where are you living, what do you do for work? Typically, when we’d get to that
last one, they would get very excited to hear that someone they knew had
written a novel – one that they could actually buy and hold in their hands –
and that I was doing book tours and conventions to promote it.
The expected follow-up question
would then arise: “What is it about?”
Now I,
like many contemporary horror writers have been advised against labeling our
books “horror” because, well…horror doesn’t really sell as well these days; not
like it used to anyway; “paranormal” and “dark fantasy” are popular sub-genres
that have arisen to target specific elements of what used to be the “horror”
catch-all. And so, obediently, I answer,
“It’s a supernatural thriller.”
“Hmmm”, they’d most often reply,
nodding cordially, obviously not truly understanding what exactly these words
meant strung together. Is it a mystery? A crime novel? One person even said,
“So…it’s a religious book?” Most of the time, when I’d say “supernatural
thriller,” they’d just look at me for a moment as if I wasn’t done speaking, hoping
that I’d fill in the gap. And then I’d add contritely, “It’s a horror book.”
Ohhhhhhh.
And then came – often, but not
always – the raised eyebrows. And the follow up questions, chiefly amongst them
being: “So, why did you choose to write a horror book?”
While the reaction is not nearly as
profound as it might’ve been twenty or thirty years ago, there is indeed a
strange bias at work. Normal people suddenly become amateur psychologists,
asking probing follow up questions, attempting to ascertain the point in my
life wherein my fragile psyche was so irrevocably damaged that I’d feel the
need to write – not just a short story, but a whole novel – in a genre
typically reserved for the damaged and the deranged, the strange misanthropic
lurkers who are unable to maintain eye contact and keep normal conversation,
but who are absolutely first in line for the latest slasher extravaganza.
So, I guess the title of this post
might just have easily been “What Kind of Sicko WRITES Horror?” Or perhaps
they’re not being quite that judgmental. Perhaps I’ve just grown sensitive to
the looks, the subtle nods, and glances down noses. Regardless, the bias, in my
estimation, is this: you have to be a little damaged to write (or read or
enjoy) horror.
To this, I say, unequivocally, “Bullshit”.
Before I go on, I think it’s a good
time for me to say that I don’t consider myself damaged (any more than any of
us are) and I’m absolutely not ashamed of what I write. In fact, I’m pretty
darn proud to be a part of a genre that boasts such luminaries as Poe, Wells, Stevenson,
Stoker, Jackson, Matheson, King, Koontz, Barker, Ellison, Lovecraft, Serling,
and Hitchcock, and that’s just for starters. While I don’t count myself among
their ranks, I am humbled to be at the same party.
I am much more dismayed by the
reactions I receive because it typically means that the person I’m talking to
holds a bias toward an entire genre of books, and that usually means that they
don’t really know what that genre –
horror – is all about. I think many of them assume horror equates to the blood
and gore and sadistic torture that has taken the place of nuanced storytelling
in much of the recent horror movie fare. Or that it is akin to the innumerable
splatter sequels that became so popular in the eighties, and keep marching forward.
If that’s the only way someone knows horror, then they don’t really know horror
at all; it’s like judging a whole family by way of the two mischievous cousins
you met at the roller derby.
Now, there has been many a case
made in defense of horror, and I won’t delve too deeply into those here. Some
say that we create fantastical horror because it’s a manageable proxy for the
real horror that surrounds us on a daily basis; vampires and ghouls are much
easier to battle than cancer. Others argue that horror storytelling provides a
real emotional catharsis that is absolute necessary for our emotional
development as human creatures. And for others, horror connects them with their
innocent childlike self, full of imagination, hope, optimism, and yes, fear.
But horror doesn’t have to be either empowering
or hopeful to be powerful, necessarily; just look at most of Poe’s work.
But I think horror resonates with
us at a deeper level, a primal one. I think we’re hard wired to appreciate the
visceral reaction a good scary story produces inside of us: the surge of
adrenaline, the elevated heartbeat, the sweaty palms, the rush of endorphins.
We’re cavemen with no predators; for most of us reading this, we don’t worry
about getting to work each day uneaten – at least, I hope we don’t. Horror
allows us to tap into our lizard brain; the part of us hardwired for fight or flight,
and then move safely on to the next activity in our day. It’s the same reason
we enjoy rollercoasters or waterskiing or skydiving, except reading can be done
from the security of our easy chair.
So do you have to be deranged to
write (and read) horror?
No more so than being a
rollercoaster junkie or enjoying a haunted house at Halloween. Except with
horror writing, you often get lovable protagonists, memorable villains,
wonderful prose, and much of the time, a deeper message, something to walk away
with, to savor and return to. If you’ve avoided horror up to this point, I urge
you to dive in. How cool is it to think that there is a whole genre out there
ready to be discovered and enjoyed?
So, what kind of sicko reads
horror?
Me. My friends. My mom. My
colleagues. Parents. Children. Teachers. Students. My doctor. My handyman.
In short, damn near everyone.
When people ask me why I write
horror, I have no answer. I never really made a conscious choice about what
genre I would write in. It wasn’t a decision I wrestled with. The stories that
fascinate me typically have horror elements at their heart. I have said before
that I just love to see what humans do when facing off against an
overwhelmingly evil force. Will they overcome? Do the seemingly impossible?
Rise to the occasion? I’m an optimist at heart, so I think for me, the answer
is typically yes. Writer G.K. Chesterson said, “Fairy tales don’t tell children
that dragons exist. Children already know that dragons exist. Fairy tales tell
children that dragons can be killed.” I like that very much.
So, why
do you read horror?
Geddy’s Moon
by John Mulhall
Tyler is an amnesiac, drifting aimlessly across the country, struggling to regain his lost memories. When he arrives in Geddy’s Moon, a sleepy town in the middle of the Kansas wheat fields, fragments of his past begin to resurface.
But as he establishes new relationships in town, and spends time with the local librarian and her son, he finds himself tormented by nightmares that grow more unsettling each night.
What horrific events took place before Tyler arrived in Geddy’s Moon? And could he have brought a terrifying – and possibly supernatural – danger along with him?
As the pieces of his fractured memory begin to fall into place, he fears that it may already be too late to keep himself, and those he’s begun to care about, safe from a vicious evil.
Get it at Amazon
About the Author:
Geddy’s Moon is John Mulhall’s debut novel. In addition to being an award-winning video and event producer, John is also the author of several short stories, plays and a collection of poetry. He began developing Geddy’s Moon more than twenty years ago at age nineteen, but he promises his next novel won’t take quite so long. He lives in Newbury Park, California, where he is the President/CEO of a creative agency.
http://www.johnmulhall.com
https://www.facebook.com/authorjohnmulhall
https://twitter.com/john_mulhall
4 comments:
The great theorist, Edmund Burke ties in the concept of terror with that of experiencing the "sublime." Here's what he says:
"Whatever is fitted in any sort to excite the ideas of pain, and danger … whatever is in any sort terrible, or is conversant about terrible objects, or operates in a manner analogous to terror, is a source of the sublime; that is, it is productive of the strongest emotion which the mind is capable of feeling." His point is that experiencing terror from a distance (i.e. by reading a book about zombies, and not necessarily having to face an actual zombie), heightens our emotions to the state of experiencing the "sublime," which is an unparalleled, almost euphoric sensory experience.
So there you go. That's why real "horror" (one that is nuanced, and not just getting off on cheap and gratuitous violence and gore) is appealing.
To be honest, I'm not a big fan of the commercialized horror genre (and definitely not a fan of sparkling vampires), but am learning to give in to the emotional upheaval that a really good horror story can bring.
Great post!
I love that about Edmund Burke, the idea that horror produces a euphoric sensation, much in the same way a roller-coaster or sky-diving might. It's something I've long identified with.
Just a note - it is also available as a NOOK book at Barnes & Noble.
A long time fan of Koontz, I find well-written horror stories fascinating. The characters often face situations that take them dramatically out of their 'normal' world - how would you act in such a situation...what would you do...fascinating
Post a Comment